Blog

  • Big Tech Gets Another Free Pass While Canadians Pay the Price of Inaction

    Our government just scrapped the Digital Services Tax, and let me tell you why this decision should concern every Canadian who cares about fairness in our economy.

    This wasn’t part of some grand trade deal. This was pure politics. Donald Trump demanded we drop the tax before he’d even sit down to negotiate, and our government folded. Now we’re left holding the bag while some of the world’s richest companies walk away scot free.

    What the tax actually was

    We’re talking about a modest levy on digital giants like Amazon, Meta, Google, and Apple, companies that collectively raked in over $1 trillion last year. These aren’t struggling startups. They’re making billions right here in Canada, but because they operate online and keep their profits offshore, they dodge most of our taxes.

    Meanwhile, your local hardware store, the bookshop downtown, the family restaurant on Main Street all pay their full share. How is that fair?

    The damage is already done

    Walk through our downtowns and you’ll see what I’m talking about. Empty storefronts where hardware stores used to be. “For Lease” signs on buildings that once housed independent bookshops. The little repair shops where you could talk to someone who actually knew how to fix things, most of them are gone.

    These weren’t just businesses. They were the places that hired local kids for summer jobs, sponsored community hockey teams, and donated prizes for school fundraisers. The owners knew their customers by name and let community groups use their back rooms for meetings. When they disappear, we don’t just lose convenient shopping, we lose the fabric that holds our communities together.

    The news industry tells an even starker story. Google and Meta have vacuumed up nearly all the advertising revenue that used to keep local newspapers and radio stations afloat. Hundreds have closed their doors. That means fewer reporters covering city council meetings, fewer investigations into local issues, and more communities left in the dark about what their governments are actually doing.

    And when things go wrong online, when seniors get scammed, when kids face cyberbullying, when small businesses deal with fraud, good luck getting help. You’ll get a chatbot, not a human being. These companies have made billions off Canadian users, but they’ve outsourced customer service to algorithms.

    The next wave is already here

    Artificial intelligence is coming for jobs we thought were safe: teachers, graphic designers, writers, healthcare workers. The AI tools replacing these professionals? They’re built by the same tech giants we just gave a tax break to, often using content created by the very people whose jobs are now at risk.

    This isn’t about being anti technology or anti innovation. It’s about basic fairness. If you’re making billions in Canada, you should contribute to Canada. If your business model is disrupting entire industries, you should help communities adapt. If you’re profiting from Canadian data and Canadian users, you should be accountable to Canadian standards.

    We gave up our leverage first

    Let’s not forget that Canada didn’t dream up this digital tax in isolation. We’ve been working with our international partners through the OECD for years to develop a coordinated approach to taxing digital giants. These companies operate globally, and they’ve gotten very good at playing countries against each other to avoid taxes everywhere. The OECD framework was designed to close those loopholes with a unified approach that would be much harder to dodge.

    The Digital Services Tax wasn’t perfect, but it was a start and part of a broader international effort. Walking away from it with nothing in return sends a clear message: if you’re big enough and foreign enough, you can write your own rules in Canada.

    If a broader agreement genuinely lands, that would be welcome news. A comprehensive deal that addresses these issues fairly would be better than our patchwork approach. But we need to be realistic about what we’ve given up and what we’re counting on. We’ve removed our main piece of leverage before seeing what’s actually on the table.

    We should be standing up for working people, protecting the businesses that actually contribute to our communities, and making sure the digital future works for everyone, not just Silicon Valley shareholders. This moment requires us to keep our eyes on what matters: ensuring that those who profit from our economy contribute their fair share, and that the benefits of technological change don’t come at the expense of the communities we serve.

    Source

    Canada rescinds Digital Services Tax to advance broader trade negotiations with the United States — Department of Finance Canada, June 2025.

  • Nelson and District Recreation Commission No. 5

    1 October 2025

    Operations

    The Commission received quarterly operations and programming reports for the Nelson and District Community Complex. The aquatics facility closed August 31 to September 13 for its annual shutdown, which covered cleaning and maintenance of the pool basins, deck and changerooms, and a rebuild of the dry sauna. The fitness studio and fitness centre had their own short closures for floor renewal and equipment maintenance. Gyro Pool ran one to six each afternoon through the summer, with three days lost to weather.

    Air handler replacement for the cardio and weight rooms was underway, with a heat pump head for the stretching area to follow. An engineering assessment was completed on the leisure pool filter valves, which the manufacturer no longer supplies, and the work was awarded to Micah’s Plumbing. Engineering was also requested for the arena emergency exit portico roofs.

    Summer programming ran 47 camps with 546 registrants, down from 48 camps and 681 registrants in 2024. Four camps were cancelled. Staffing shortages early in the season forced caps on registration, and 63 people were waitlisted, 90 percent of them for specialized camps. Swim lessons reached 64 percent capacity. The aquatics roster sat at 100 percent of 2020 staffing levels, but availability remained variable and recruitment continued across lifeguards, instructors and recreation leaders.

    Aspirations

    The Nelson Volleyball Club followed up on its July delegation with detail on building beach courts in the Nelson area. Four courts are estimated at 144,000 dollars. The club has access to a 35,000 dollar Volleyball BC grant, conditional on all four courts being at a single site, and expects to raise a quarter to a third of the cost from its members. The Columbia Basin Trust indicated it would consider a similar share if local government also contributes.

    The club reviewed the alternative locations the Commission suggested. Balfour, Kokanee Creek Provincial Park, Slocan and Campbell Field were each ruled out on distance, jurisdiction, season length or site conditions. Taghum, Lions and Lakeside remain the club’s preferred options, and staff have committed to working with the club as a stakeholder on a possible Taghum expansion.

    Civic Arena

    The Civic Arena operating season was set to run October 14, 2025 to March 13, 2026. Staff had begun preparing the ice surface. Snow load restrictions remain in place and were communicated to arena user groups through the allocation process.

    Challenges

    Recruitment is the recurring constraint. Camp registration was capped because staff could not be hired in time, and the waitlist for specialized camps points to demand the service could not meet. Open postings at the time of the meeting covered group fitness, lifeguards and swim instructors, aquafit, youth recreation, arena staff and personal training.

    How this report was written

  • Nelson and District Recreation Commission No. 5 — 26 August 2026

    26 August 2026

    Operations

    The Commission received an update on ice allocation for the 2026/2027 season at the Nelson and District Community Complex, along with the administrative work behind the seasonal schedule. Allocation at the complex is governed by Recreation Allocation Policy No. 500-01-09, adopted by the RDCK Board in April 2022, which sets user categories, scoring criteria and priority levels based on an assessment of public benefit.

    At its July 29 meeting the Commission had approved a set of agreements that shape complex operations for the coming years: renewal of the Mobi-Mat and Mobi-Wheelchair service agreement with the City of Nelson through April 2029, a three-year facility use agreement with the Nelson Leafs, a concession agreement for the complex, and an increase to the parking limit from two hours to three.

    The refrigeration plant replacement at the complex is complete and the arena is making ice for the coming season. The project was the largest capital item in the 2026 budget at roughly 1.05 million dollars, funded from reserves and prior year surplus. Work through the spring and early summer included the closure of the Lake Street alleyway, which has since reopened.

    The Commission also considered liquor licensing at the complex. The RDCK is working with the provincial liquor branch to ensure the arrangements for third party operators using RDCK facilities meet the regulatory requirements. Licensing is a statutory matter, and the work underway is producing a standard of practice that will be applied consistently across all RDCK facilities rather than settled facility by facility.

    Aspirations

    The Commission directed staff to review Recreation Allocation Policy No. 500-01-09 and its accompanying procedures, and to report back to the first All-Recreation Meeting in 2027 with recommendations for amendment. Staff identified several areas where the policy and procedures lack clarity, including how historical bookings are treated, how schedules are optimized, how allocation decisions are documented, the balance between prime and non-prime time, and the Commission’s own role in appeals.

    That review matters beyond hockey. The same policy governs allocation across RDCK recreation facilities, so the outcome will set expectations for every user group that books time, and give staff a clearer basis for decisions that are inherently going to disappoint someone.

    Challenges

    Nelson Minor Hockey appealed its allocation for the coming season, raising the fit between the schedule it received and the policy criterion on suitability and appropriateness to time of day for youth users. Staff recommended leaving the allocation unchanged. After a lengthy discussion about the intent of the policy and how it had been applied, the Commission unanimously took a different course, adopting the option of directing staff to change the allocation decision and return with a reorganized schedule, together with the policy review.

    The Commission did not find that the policy had been misapplied. There was enough question about whether its interpretation had been fully carried through that the Commission asked staff to look again at the pieces of the allocation that were in conflict and find a better arrangement.

    Nelson resident Marta Abel wrote to the Commission about how indoor recreation is managed during wildfire smoke events, and my thanks to her for raising it. Demand at indoor facilities climbs on smoke days, and the pattern is showing up at Castlegar and other RDCK recreation facilities, not only in Nelson. Staff are looking at how to plan staffing and programming for those days so the facilities can absorb the increase when people need somewhere clean to be.

    How this report was written

  • RDCK Board of Directors — Regular Business

    2026-08-20

    > Board Strategic Priorities > > Develop Relationships and Partnerships > Manage our Assets and Service Delivery in a Fiscally Responsible Manner > Regional Approach to Growth > Energy Efficiency and Environmental Responsibility

    Recreation facility agreements — The Board adopted a number of agreements across its three community complexes in Creston, Castlegar and Nelson, covering facility use by hockey societies and concession operations, and supporting the operation of those facilities over the coming years.

    The Board has been working toward greater consistency across the region in how it deals with hockey user groups, so that the resources available at each facility are put to their best use. The specifics of the Nelson agreements are covered in the Nelson & District Recreation Commission No. 5 summary for July 29, 2026.

    Resource recovery — The Board approved the 2026 Compost Sales Plan for screened Class A compost produced at the Central and Creston compost facilities, to be sold at the Central Transfer Station, Ootischenia Landfill and Creston Landfill. Compost is priced at $30 per cubic metre for loads of two cubic metres or less, and $50 per tonne for loads greater than two cubic metres, with a minimum charge of $7.50 for loads under a quarter cubic metre. Revenue from Creston sales goes to the East Subregion organics service, and revenue from the Central Transfer Station and Ootischenia to the Central and West Subregions service.

    The Board also approved the purchase of a Bale Station roll-off hoist for the tridem axle roll-off truck from Universal Handling Equipment Ltd., at $94,354 plus PST of $6,604.78, for a total of $100,958.78, paid from the Central Subregion refuse disposal service.

    Governance reform: a venue for whole-board discussion — Staff recommended reconstituting the Community Sustainable Living Advisory Committee as a standing committee of the Board, modelled on the Rural Affairs Committee but with municipal representation, together with a funding model and a wind-down of the Service S105 requisition by the 2028 financial plan.

    The Board did not adopt that shape. It directed staff to return with a range of models, including a committee of the whole, that would give the Board a forum for generative discussion as a full body rather than continuing to work through separate committees where related conversations happen in isolation from one another.

    The RDCK does not currently have that kind of meeting. Business runs through sub-regional committees and service-specific commissions, each with its own membership, and the full Board convenes principally to decide rather than to work through direction together. Governance reform has been a commitment of this Board and a substantial body of its work over the past four years. This direction continues that work rather than beginning something new.

    Goat River Watershed — The Board approved a consulting services agreement with Western Water Associates Ltd. for a preliminary assessment of hydraulic connectivity in the Goat River watershed, to a maximum of $79,851 plus GST, running from August 21, 2026 to March 31, 2028, together with the financial plan amendments to fund it and to recognize grant funding from the Investment Agriculture Foundation of British Columbia for direct producer engagement in the watershed.

    These passed without significant debate, but the work behind them is substantial. It establishes watershed protection and planning for an area that has not had it, and the RDCK does not currently provide that kind of support elsewhere in the region.

    Regional water and wastewater framework — The Board directed staff to develop a Regional Water and Wastewater Sustainability Framework, setting out the governance, principles, eligibility criteria, evaluation methodology, planning requirements and decision-making under which the RDCK could provide administrative, technical or financial support to water and wastewater systems it does not own. This includes consideration of Community Works Fund investment in eligible third-party water and wastewater infrastructure that demonstrates regional benefit and aligns with Board priorities.

    How this report was written

  • Nelson council to consider joining B.C.’s e-scooter pilot

    A resident asks council to look at the provincial e-scooter pilot, and the case for sorting out education and safety before the rules change.

    Read the story

  • Nelson, Salmo, Areas E, F and G Regional Parks Commission — 10 June 2026

    2026-06-10

    Operations

    A light meeting on the operations side. No staff reports were scheduled. The April 8, 2026 minutes were received. The agenda ran to two delegations, public time, and adjournment.

    Aspirations

    Both items in front of the Commission came from community organizations with a vision for how to improve the spaces they use.

    The Blewett Community Society presented a phased plan for a permanent rink at Morning Mountain Regional Park. Jacob Cloutier, Lukas Armstrong and Coordinator Valerie May Evans laid out the case: the existing temporary rink has dropped to a handful of skateable days, and without a change the site will not be able to offer a rink for many more years. Phase one is a gravel sub base, concrete pad, timber foundations and boards, at roughly three hundred and five thousand. Phase two adds the chiller and timber roof at roughly five hundred and seventy thousand, for a total near eight hundred and seventy-five thousand. That is a Class D estimate, plus or minus thirty percent, on a conceptual design. The Society was explicit that it was not asking for funding. It was asking for permission to keep the conversation going with the RDCK and Parks, and it came with a list of potential funders it had deliberately not yet approached, pending that permission.

    The Nelson Nordic Ski Club, represented by General Manager John Bowden and Peter Holton of Holton Planning Associates, proposed extending the current grooming program two kilometres south of the Euphrates shelter. The extension would compensate for five kilometres of trail lost on private land, offer longer spring snow retention, and add low cost terrain suited to a range of abilities including school groups and beginners. The work required is modest: brushing, rock removal, and a seven by seven metre turnaround area for the grooming machine. Access management would mirror the north entrance near Cottonwood Lake, with a partial gate, signage, a QR code for online payment, and restrictions on dogs.

    Both requests were referred forward for discussion at a future meeting. Nothing was decided at this meeting.

    The Commission expressed its gratitude to both organizations for the work they do in the community.

    How this report was written

  • Nelson and District Recreation Commission No. 5 — 27 May 2026

    2026-05-27

    Operations

    The Nelson and District Community Complex ran a difficult spring on the building side. A glycol leak in one of the rooftop units closed the pool on March 31. Refrigeration plant work continued, with the Lake Street alleyway closed to traffic until the end of July. Staff advised that the elevator will need replacement around 2027.

    Aquatics staffing remains the pressure point. The complex is running at roughly 85 percent of its 2019 aquatic staffing levels, with lifeguards and supervisors the hardest positions to fill. Nia Contini was hired as Assistant Manager, starting June 1.

    Programming numbers moved in the right direction. Youth recreation registrations filled to 67 percent of capacity, up from 58 percent, with themed programming outperforming un-themed sessions. Swim lessons served 262 children, up from 242. Overall complex visits were down slightly, driven by membership scans rather than program participation, while facility rentals were up.

    Aspirations

    The main forward-looking item was the Recreation Campus Capital Funding Service report, which the Commission had directed staff to prepare at its January 28 meeting. The report set out that the existing service bylaw already provides the legislative authority to fund capital work across the campus, including on City-owned assets, and laid out three routes: amending the existing bylaw, creating a new standalone capital service requiring elector approval, or a contribution agreement with the City. Any of those routes runs roughly a year from start to finish.

    The Commission also considered the City’s request for proposals on studio space at the Civic Centre. As Chair I wrote to Council asking that the deadline be extended to the end of September so the Commission and the RDCK could evaluate the space against existing recreation use, including youth summer camp bookings. The letter was received. The original deadline stood.

    Challenges

    The capital funding report was deferred at this meeting, and deferred again on July 29 with no date attached. The Recreation Campus carries mixed ownership, with the Civic Arena, Civic Centre Blue Room, Gyro Park and the lakeside washrooms held by the City, and the community complex and North Shore Hall held by the RDCK. The City and the RDCK also currently take different approaches to asset management. Sorting out how capital gets funded across that split is the substantive question in front of this Commission, and it has not yet had its hearing.

    Alongside that, the staffing shortfall in aquatics and the age of the building systems are the two operating constraints that shape what the complex can offer.

    How this report was written

  • City of Nelson Councillor Keith Page

    Cross Border Interviews hosts a full-length conversation on Nelson and the work of local government.

    Read the story

  • Motion passed by RDCK to be part of governance structure after Basin-wide broadband sale

    The RDCK board passed a motion to formally engage Columbia Basin Trust and CityWest on a binding shared governance framework for Basin broadband.

    Read the story

  • Nelson, Salmo, Areas E, F and G Regional Parks Commission — 8 April 2026

    2026-04-08

    Operations

    Two staff reports, both for information. All five commissioners present, no delegates.

    Trisha Davison, General Manager of Community Services, brought back a draft framework for the workshop on municipal grant and capital funding requests, responding to the January direction. It set out who would be in the room, commissioners with RDCK Community Services and Finance staff plus Nelson and Salmo representatives, and what existing practice it would review: the Rec 5 prioritization framework, existing cost sharing agreements, RDCK grant program criteria, and the draft Parks, Trail and Water Access Strategy. Next steps were to confirm the framework, set a date by the third week of April, and hold the workshop.

    Mark Crowe, Regional Park Planner, reported on Taghum Beach since the November concept renderings. Concepts went to directors and to Teck for comment, Masse Environmental was contracted for the ecological overview assessment, costing was requested from the landscape architect for hypothetical parking lot phasing, and RDCK GIS completed drone work to inform the assessments. The ecological assessment and a project plan with phasing and consultation options are both due in the fall.

    Aspirations

    The workshop discussion moved past the framework as drafted. Where the staff report organized around evaluation criteria and governance structures, the Commission went to a more fundamental question: which parks and assets are regional in nature and which are community in nature, and letting that distinction drive allocation decisions so that what gets funded is well funded and operates well.

    Members asked that the next report bring research, financial history and timelines before the workshop is designed, with a poll to follow and the aim of holding it before June 10.

    Challenges

    Taghum Beach carries a real tension. The Commission recognized the need for a bigger plan, and alongside it there was urgency at the table to identify initial steps that address the immediate parking situation without committing to a long process, chasing millions of dollars of planning that does not turn into action.

    How this report was written

  • City of Nelson pushes for federal ‘duty of care’ law for digital platforms

    Nelson council unanimously agreed to carry an online harms resolution to AKBLG, then UBCM and FCM, asking the federal government to establish a duty of care for digital platforms.

    Read the story